Henri Rousseau, 'Boy on the Rocks', 1895 - 7
Its very hard to tell whether this is a 'real' boy, a life-like doll, or some kind of wierd cross between the two like Pinocchio. He / it doesnt look quite human in that the head floats above the black void of the torso, the face looks too old for the rest of the body, his right hand fingers look as if they have been chopped off, and the size of the legs are grossly exagerrated. Also, is he standing, sitting, or hovering on / above the rocks? I hope hope for his sake he's not sitting on them. Anyway, if he was sitting on these jagged rocks we would no longer see the serene/lifeless expression on his face. The same if he were standing; it would take a lot of concentration and physical effort to stand still on a landscape such as these rocks. So then, he/it most be hovering or floating. Usually, it is easy to see whether a painting depicts a 'live' person, but not with 'Boy on the Rocks', which leaves us with an intriguing yet uncanny uncertainty. Obviously, Henri Rousseau was a frikkin genius! |
No comments:
Post a Comment